Umbraco 4.1 Benchmarks Part 1 (Do Over)
This post was imported from FARMCode.org which has been discontinued. These posts now exist here as an archive. They may contain broken links and images.
Doh! Turns out that my first Umbraco 4.1 benchmarks was done on a build of 4.1 that had a couple of bugs in it :( BUT, this turns out to be even better for 4.1 that I previously thought! (plus there’s bugs fixed now :) If you didn’t read the last post, i recommend that you do as it has some insight as to how these stats came to be. So, without further adieu, here’s the (true) new results:
Test | Stats | 4.0.3 | 4.0.3 client cached | 4.1 | 4.1 client cached |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content app | Completed Requests | 68 | 7 | 45 | 5 |
Response (KB) | 687.05 | 72.48 | 382.42 | 11.61 | |
Edit content home page | Completed Requests | 50 | 2 | 34 | 1 |
Response (KB) | 385.10 | 47.28 | 335.02 | 11.94 | |
Expand all content nodes | Completed Requests | 17 | 17 | 16 | 16 |
Response (KB) | 18.47 | 18.47 | 13.96 | 7.54 | |
TOTALS | Completed Requests | 135 | 26 | 95 | 22 |
Response (KB) | 1063.62 | 138.23 | 731.40 | 31.09 |
So to recap, here’s the total average savings in 4.1
- Without client cache (First run)
- Number of completed requests: 30% Less
- Response bandwidth: 31% Less
- With client cache
- Number of completed requests: 6% Less
- Response bandwidth: 78% Less
comments powered by Disqus